AMD FirePro S9000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

FX 4800
2.56

FirePro S9000 outperforms Quadro FX 4800 by 410% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking784356
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.094.22
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGT200BTahiti
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date11 November 2008 (15 years old)24 August 2012 (11 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,799 $2,499
Current price$632 (0.4x MSRP)$433 (0.2x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

FirePro S9000 has 4589% better value for money than FX 4800.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1921792
Core clock speed602 MHz900 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt350 Watt
Texture fill rate38.53100.8
Floating-point performance462.3 gflops3,226 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB6 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1600 MHz5500 MHz
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s264 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort countno data1
Dual-link DVI supportno data1

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.3no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 4800 2.56
FirePro S9000 13.05
+410%

FirePro S9000 outperforms Quadro FX 4800 by 410% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

FX 4800 991
FirePro S9000 5059
+410%

FirePro S9000 outperforms Quadro FX 4800 by 410% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 2.56 13.05
Recency 11 November 2008 24 August 2012
Cost $1799 $2499
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 350 Watt

The FirePro S9000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 4800 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
Quadro FX 4800
AMD FirePro S9000
FirePro S9000

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 58 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 7 votes

Rate AMD FirePro S9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.