Radeon RX 560DX vs Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGT200BPolaris 21
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date11 November 2008 (17 years ago)11 April 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,799 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192896
Core clock speed602 MHz1090 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1175 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate38.5365.80
Floating-point processing power0.4623 TFLOPS2.106 TFLOPS
ROPs2416
TMUs6456
L1 Cacheno data224 KB
L2 Cache192 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length267 mm170 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s96 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 November 2008 11 April 2018
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 65 Watt

RX 560DX has an age advantage of 9 years, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 292.9% more advanced lithography process, and 130.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and Radeon RX 560DX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 560DX is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
AMD Radeon RX 560DX
Radeon RX 560DX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 5 votes

Rate Radeon RX 560DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition or Radeon RX 560DX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.