Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics vs Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameGT200BBeema
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date11 November 2008 (17 years ago)23 February 2016 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,799 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19264
Core clock speed602 MHz497 MHz
Boost clock speedno data600 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million930 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate38.533.976
Floating-point processing power0.4623 TFLOPS0.06362 TFLOPS
ROPs244
TMUs648
L2 Cache192 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1536 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.06.5 (6.0)
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.2.170
CUDA1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 November 2008 23 February 2016
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 15 Watt

R1E Mobile Graphics has an age advantage of 7 years, a 96% more advanced lithography process, and 900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition or Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.