Radeon Pro V320 vs Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGT200BVega 10
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date11 November 2008 (17 years ago)29 June 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,799 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1923584
Core clock speed602 MHz852 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate38.53336.0
Floating-point processing power0.4623 TFLOPS10.75 TFLOPS
ROPs2464
TMUs64224
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cache192 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB8 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz945 MHz
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s483.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 November 2008 29 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 230 Watt

FX 4800 Mac Edition has 53.3% lower power consumption.

Pro V320, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and Radeon Pro V320. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
AMD Radeon Pro V320
Radeon Pro V320

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 7 votes

Rate Radeon Pro V320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition or Radeon Pro V320, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.