Radeon 540 Mobile vs Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGT200BLexa
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date11 November 2008 (16 years ago)26 March 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,799 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192512
Core clock speed602 MHz1100 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1124 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate38.5335.97
Floating-point processing power0.4623 TFLOPS1.151 TFLOPS
ROPs2416
TMUs6432
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cache192 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB2 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s48 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 November 2008 26 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 50 Watt

540 Mobile has an age advantage of 10 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 292.9% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and Radeon 540 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 540 Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
AMD Radeon 540 Mobile
Radeon 540 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 16 votes

Rate Radeon 540 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition or Radeon 540 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.