Radeon PRO V710 vs Quadro FX 470

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated198
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data15.22
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameC79Navi 32
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date12 September 2007 (18 years ago)3 October 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores163456
Core clock speed580 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2000 MHz
Number of transistors314 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)38 Watt158 Watt
Texture fill rate4.640432.0
Floating-point processing power0.0448 TFLOPS27.65 TFLOPS
ROPs496
TMUs8216
Ray Tracing Coresno data54
L0 Cacheno data864 KB
L1 Cacheno data768 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB
L3 Cacheno data54 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared28 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared224 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data504.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVINo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.2
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 September 2007 3 October 2024
Chip lithography 65 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 38 Watt 158 Watt

FX 470 has 315.8% lower power consumption.

PRO V710, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 17 years, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 470 and Radeon PRO V710. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 470
Quadro FX 470
AMD Radeon PRO V710
Radeon PRO V710

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Quadro FX 470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon PRO V710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 470 or Radeon PRO V710, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.