Tesla S1075 vs Quadro FX 4600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1141not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.55no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameG80GT200B
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date5 March 2007 (18 years ago)1 June 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96240 ×4
Core clock speed500 MHz610 MHz
Number of transistors681 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)134 Watt800 Watt
Texture fill rate24.0048.80 ×4
Floating-point processing power0.2304 TFLOPS0.6221 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs2432 ×4
TMUs2480 ×4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount768 MB4 GB ×4
Memory bus width384 Bit512 Bit ×4
Memory clock speed700 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth67.2 GB/s102.4 GB/s ×4

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 March 2007 1 June 2008
Maximum RAM amount 768 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 134 Watt 800 Watt

FX 4600 has 497% lower power consumption.

Tesla S1075, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 63.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 4600 and Tesla S1075. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
Quadro FX 4600
NVIDIA Tesla S1075
Tesla S1075

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 13 votes

Rate Quadro FX 4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2 votes

Rate Tesla S1075 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 4600 or Tesla S1075, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.