Radeon R7 M265DX vs Quadro FX 4000 SDI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1102
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameNV41Topaz
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date19 April 2004 (22 years ago)12 October 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,999 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed425 MHz925 MHz
Boost clock speedno data940 MHz
Number of transistors190 million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Wattno data
Texture fill rate5.10022.56
Floating-point processing powerno data0.7219 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs1224
L1 Cacheno data96 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16IGP
Length214 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x SDINo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_0)
Shader Model3.06.3
OpenGL2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)4.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 April 2004 12 October 2014
Chip lithography 130 nm 28 nm

R7 M265DX has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 364% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 4000 SDI and Radeon R7 M265DX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 4000 SDI is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R7 M265DX is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 4000 SDI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 29 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M265DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 4000 SDI or Radeon R7 M265DX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.