ATI Graphics Ultra Pro vs Quadro FX 380M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1404not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.89no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)no data
GPU code nameGT218Mach32
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date7 January 2010 (16 years ago)1 January 1993 (33 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16no data
Core clock speed606 MHz10 MHz
Number of transistors260 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm800 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Wattno data
Texture fill rate4.848no data
Floating-point processing power0.04698 TFLOPSno data
ROPs41
TMUs8no data
L2 Cache32 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16VLB
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3VRAM
Maximum RAM amount512 MB1 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed790 MHz10 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.64 GB/s80.0 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)None
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.3None
OpenCL1.1None
VulkanN/A-
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2010 1 January 1993
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 1 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 800 nm

FX 380M has an age advantage of 17 years, a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 380M and Graphics Ultra Pro. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 380M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Graphics Ultra Pro is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Quadro FX 380M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 10 votes

Rate Graphics Ultra Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 380M or Graphics Ultra Pro, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.