Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs Quadro FX 3800M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1042not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.05no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameG92Tiger Lake GT2
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date14 August 2008 (17 years ago)2 September 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128768
Core clock speed675 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1100 MHz
Number of transistors754 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology65 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate43.2052.80
Floating-point processing power0.4224 TFLOPS1.69 TFLOPS
ROPs1624
TMUs6448
L2 Cache64 KB1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data3.75 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)Ring Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth64 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 August 2008 2 September 2020
Chip lithography 65 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 15 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU has an age advantage of 12 years, a 550% more advanced lithography process, and 566.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 3800M and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 3800M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
Quadro FX 3800M
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 7 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3800M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 166 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 3800M or Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.