GeForce4 410 Go vs Quadro FX 3800M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1059not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.02no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameG92NV17 A3
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date14 August 2008 (17 years ago)6 February 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speed675 MHz200 MHz
Number of transistors754 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Wattno data
Texture fill rate43.200.8
Floating-point processing power0.4224 TFLOPSno data
ROPs162
TMUs644
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)AGP 4x

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB16 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s3.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)8.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 August 2008 6 February 2002
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 16 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 150 nm

FX 3800M has an age advantage of 6 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 130.8% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 3800M and GeForce4 410 Go. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 3800M is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce4 410 Go is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
Quadro FX 3800M
NVIDIA GeForce4 410 Go
GeForce4 410 Go

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 7 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3800M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate GeForce4 410 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 3800M or GeForce4 410 Go, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.