Tesla V100 PCIe vs Quadro FX 3800

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking861not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.06no data
Power efficiency1.37no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGT200BGV100
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date30 March 2009 (15 years ago)21 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1925120
Core clock speed600 MHz1246 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1380 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)108 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate38.40441.6
Floating-point processing power0.4623 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16128
TMUs64320

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length198 mmno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1758 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s900.1 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12.0
Shader Model4.05.0
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A-
CUDA1.37.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 March 2009 21 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 108 Watt 250 Watt

FX 3800 has 131.5% lower power consumption.

Tesla V100 PCIe, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 358.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 3800 and Tesla V100 PCIe. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
Quadro FX 3800
NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe
Tesla V100 PCIe

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 49 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 113 votes

Rate Tesla V100 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.