Radeon Pro V7300X vs Quadro FX 380

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1301not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency1.11no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameG96Ellesmere
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date30 March 2009 (17 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$129 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores162304
Core clock speed450 MHz1188 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1243 MHz
Number of transistors314 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)34 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate3.600179.0
Floating-point processing power0.0352 TFLOPSno data
ROPs832
TMUs8144
L2 Cache32 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length198 mm241 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz7 GB/s
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s224.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 34 Watt 130 Watt

FX 380 has 282% lower power consumption.

Pro V7300X, on the other hand, has a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 380 and Radeon Pro V7300X. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 15 votes

Rate Quadro FX 380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon Pro V7300X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 380 or Radeon Pro V7300X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.