Tesla S1075 vs Quadro FX 380 LP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1347not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency0.94no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGT218GT200B
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date1 December 2009 (15 years ago)1 June 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$169 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16240 ×4
Core clock speed550 MHz610 MHz
Number of transistors260 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt800 Watt
Texture fill rate4.40048.80 ×4
Floating-point processing power0.044 TFLOPS0.6221 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs432 ×4
TMUs880 ×4
L2 Cache32 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB ×4
Memory bus width64 Bit512 Bit ×4
Memory clock speed800 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s102.4 GB/s ×4

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.14.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.21.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 December 2009 1 June 2008
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 800 Watt

FX 380 LP has an age advantage of 1 year, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 2757.1% lower power consumption.

Tesla S1075, on the other hand, has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 380 LP and Tesla S1075. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
Quadro FX 380 LP
NVIDIA Tesla S1075
Tesla S1075

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 7 votes

Rate Quadro FX 380 LP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2 votes

Rate Tesla S1075 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 380 LP or Tesla S1075, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.