ATI FirePro RG220 vs Quadro FX 380 LP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1348not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.93no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGT218RV711
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date1 December 2009 (16 years ago)1 May 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$169 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1680
Core clock speed550 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors260 million242 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate4.4004.000
Floating-point processing power0.044 TFLOPS0.08 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs88
L2 Cache32 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s51.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort1x DMS-59

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.14.1
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 December 2009 1 May 2008
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 35 Watt

FX 380 LP has an age advantage of 1 year, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 380 LP and FirePro RG220. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
Quadro FX 380 LP
ATI FirePro RG220
FirePro RG220

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 7 votes

Rate Quadro FX 380 LP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro RG220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 380 LP or FirePro RG220, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.