Radeon R9 255 OEM vs Quadro FX 370M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1442not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.85no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameG98Cape Verde
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date15 August 2008 (17 years ago)21 December 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8512
Core clock speed550 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data930 MHz
Number of transistors210 million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate2.20029.76
Floating-point processing power0.0224 TFLOPS0.9523 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs432
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cache16 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/s73.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2008 21 December 2013
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 65 Watt

FX 370M has 225% lower power consumption.

R9 255 OEM, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 132% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 370M and Radeon R9 255 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 370M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon R9 255 OEM is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 3 votes

Rate Quadro FX 370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1069 votes

Rate Radeon R9 255 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 370M or Radeon R9 255 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.