ATI Rage 128 VR AGP vs Quadro FX 3700M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1131not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency1.11no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Rage 4 (1998−1999)
GPU code nameG92Rage 4
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date14 August 2008 (17 years ago)1 August 1998 (27 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$925 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speed550 MHz80 MHz
Number of transistors754 million8 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate35.200.16
Floating-point processing power0.352 TFLOPSno data
ROPs162
TMUs642
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-HEAGP 2x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3SDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB32 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz125 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s1 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)6.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.2
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 August 2008 1 August 1998
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 250 nm

FX 3700M has an age advantage of 10 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 284.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 3700M and Rage 128 VR AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 3700M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Rage 128 VR AGP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
Quadro FX 3700M
ATI Rage 128 VR AGP
Rage 128 VR AGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3700M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Rage 128 VR AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 3700M or Rage 128 VR AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.