Radeon HD 7720 OEM vs Quadro FX 3700M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1141not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency1.09no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameG92Barts
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date14 August 2008 (17 years ago)15 March 2013 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$925 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128800
Core clock speed550 MHz840 MHz
Number of transistors754 million1,700 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate35.2033.60
Floating-point processing power0.352 TFLOPS1.344 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs6440
L1 Cacheno data160 KB
L2 Cache64 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-HEPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data198 mm
Widthno data2-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1050 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s134.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.0
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 August 2008 15 March 2013
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 150 Watt

FX 3700M has 100% lower power consumption.

HD 7720 OEM, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 63% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 3700M and Radeon HD 7720 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 3700M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 7720 OEM is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3700M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 8 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7720 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 3700M or Radeon HD 7720 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.