GeForce FX 5700 EP vs Quadro FX 3700M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1130not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency1.10no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameG92NV36
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date14 August 2008 (17 years ago)1 September 2004 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$925 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speed550 MHz425 MHz
Number of transistors754 million82 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate35.201.700
Floating-point processing power0.352 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs644
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-HEAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s3.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0a
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.5 (2.1)
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 August 2008 1 September 2004
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 130 nm

FX 3700M has an age advantage of 3 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 3700M and GeForce FX 5700 EP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 3700M is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce FX 5700 EP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
Quadro FX 3700M
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 EP
GeForce FX 5700 EP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3700M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce FX 5700 EP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 3700M or GeForce FX 5700 EP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.