Tesla M2050 vs Quadro FX 3700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1182not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.87no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameG92GF100
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date8 January 2008 (17 years ago)25 July 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,599 $2,699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores112448
Core clock speed500 MHz575 MHz
Number of transistors754 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)78 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate28.0032.20
Floating-point processing power0.28 TFLOPS1.03 TFLOPS
ROPs1648
TMUs5656
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cache64 KB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mm248 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB3 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz773 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s148.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.12.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 January 2008 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 3 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 78 Watt 225 Watt

FX 3700 has 188.5% lower power consumption.

Tesla M2050, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 3700 and Tesla M2050. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
Quadro FX 3700
NVIDIA Tesla M2050
Tesla M2050

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 24 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Tesla M2050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 3700 or Tesla M2050, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.