ATI All-In-Wonder 128 vs Quadro FX 3700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1189not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.88no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Rage 4 (1998−1999)
GPU code nameG92Rage 4
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date8 January 2008 (18 years ago)16 June 1999 (26 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores112no data
Core clock speed500 MHz90 MHz
Number of transistors754 million8 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)78 Wattno data
Texture fill rate28.000.36
Floating-point processing power0.28 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs564
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 4x
Length267 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3SDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB32 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz90 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s720.0 MB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x VGA, 2x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)6.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.2
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 January 2008 16 June 1999
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 32 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 250 nm

FX 3700 has an age advantage of 8 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 285% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 3700 and All-In-Wonder 128. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 3700 is a workstation graphics card while All-In-Wonder 128 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 24 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 10 votes

Rate All-In-Wonder 128 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 3700 or All-In-Wonder 128, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.