ATI Mobility Radeon 7500C vs Quadro FX 370

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameG84M7
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date12 September 2007 (17 years ago)1 December 2001 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$129 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16no data
Core clock speed360 MHz230 MHz
Number of transistors289 million60 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt27 Watt
Texture fill rate2.8800.46
Floating-point processing power0.02304 TFLOPSno data
ROPs41
TMUs82

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 4x
Length198 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB16 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz183 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s2.928 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVINo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)7.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 September 2007 1 December 2001
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 16 MB
Chip lithography 80 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 27 Watt

FX 370 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 87.5% more advanced lithography process.

ATI Mobility 7500C, on the other hand, has 29.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 370 and Mobility Radeon 7500C. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 370 is a workstation card while Mobility Radeon 7500C is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
Quadro FX 370
ATI Mobility Radeon 7500C
Mobility Radeon 7500C

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.2 10 votes

Rate Quadro FX 370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Mobility Radeon 7500C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.