GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2 vs Quadro FX 370
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1431 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 0.44 | no data |
| Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) |
| GPU code name | G84 | GF110 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 12 September 2007 (17 years ago) | 6 June 2011 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $129 | $499 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 16 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 360 MHz | 772 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 289 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 244 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 2.880 | 49.41 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.02304 TFLOPS | 1.581 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 4 | 48 |
| TMUs | 8 | 64 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 198 mm | 267 mm |
| Width | 1-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR2 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 1536 MB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | 1002 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 8 GB/s | 192.4 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 12 September 2007 | 6 June 2011 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 1536 MB |
| Chip lithography | 80 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 244 Watt |
FX 370 has 597.1% lower power consumption.
GTX 580 Rev. 2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 370 and GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Quadro FX 370 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
