GeForce GT 520 PCI vs Quadro FX 370

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1451not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.44no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameG84GF119
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date12 September 2007 (18 years ago)13 April 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$129 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1648
Core clock speed360 MHz810 MHz
Number of transistors289 million292 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt29 Watt
Texture fill rate2.8806.480
Floating-point processing power0.02304 TFLOPS0.1555 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs88
L1 Cacheno data64 KB
L2 Cache16 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCI
Length198 mm168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s14.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.12.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 September 2007 13 April 2011
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 29 Watt

GT 520 PCI has an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 20.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 370 and GeForce GT 520 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 370 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GT 520 PCI is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
Quadro FX 370
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 PCI
GeForce GT 520 PCI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.2 10 votes

Rate Quadro FX 370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 12 votes

Rate GeForce GT 520 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 370 or GeForce GT 520 PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.