ATI FireGL V7350 vs Quadro FX 370

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1458not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.44no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameG84R520
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date12 September 2007 (18 years ago)1 October 2005 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$129 $1,599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16no data
Core clock speed360 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors289 million321 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt111 Watt
Texture fill rate2.8809.600
Floating-point processing power0.02304 TFLOPSno data
ROPs416
TMUs816
L2 Cache16 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length198 mm229 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz650 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s41.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model4.03.0
OpenGL3.32.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 September 2007 1 October 2005
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 111 Watt

FX 370 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 13% more advanced lithography process, and 217% lower power consumption.

ATI FireGL V7350, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 370 and FireGL V7350. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.2 10 votes

Rate Quadro FX 370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate FireGL V7350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 370 or FireGL V7350, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.