Radeon RX 6550S vs Quadro FX 370 LP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1425not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.80no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameG98Navi 24
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date6 November 2008 (17 years ago)4 January 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$129 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores81024
Core clock speed540 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2400 MHz
Number of transistors210 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate4.320153.6
Floating-point processing power0.01728 TFLOPS4.915 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs864
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L0 Cacheno data256 KB
L1 Cacheno data256 KB
L2 Cache16 KB1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Length198 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DMS-59Portable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.2
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 November 2008 4 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 50 Watt

FX 370 LP has 100% lower power consumption.

RX 6550S, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 983% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 370 LP and Radeon RX 6550S. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 370 LP is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6550S is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 4 votes

Rate Quadro FX 370 LP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 12 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6550S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 370 LP or Radeon RX 6550S, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.