ATI Radeon 9250 PCI vs Quadro FX 370 LP

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1343not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency0.77no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameG98RV280
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date6 November 2008 (16 years ago)1 March 2004 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$129 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8no data
Core clock speed540 MHz240 MHz
Number of transistors210 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Wattno data
Texture fill rate4.3200.96
Floating-point processing power0.01728 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCI
Length198 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s3.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DMS-591x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)8.1
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.4
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 November 2008 1 March 2004
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 150 nm

FX 370 LP has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 130.8% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 370 LP and Radeon 9250 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 370 LP is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 9250 PCI is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
Quadro FX 370 LP
ATI Radeon 9250 PCI
Radeon 9250 PCI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Quadro FX 370 LP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 6 votes

Rate Radeon 9250 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.