RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs Quadro FX 350M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1500not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.54no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameG72AD107
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date13 March 2006 (19 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores73072
Core clock speed450 MHz1530 MHz
Boost clock speed450 MHz2010 MHz
Number of transistors112 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate1.800193.0
Floating-point processing powerno data12.35 TFLOPS
ROPs248
TMUs496
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Coresno data24
L1 Cacheno data3 MB
L2 Cacheno data12 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed450 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.8
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 March 2006 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 50 Watt

FX 350M has 233.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 17 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 350M and RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M
Quadro FX 350M
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Quadro FX 350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 3 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 350M or RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.