GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition vs Quadro FX 350M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1506not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.56no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameG72G96C
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date13 March 2006 (19 years ago)25 October 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores732
Core clock speed450 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed450 MHzno data
Number of transistors112 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate1.8008.000
Floating-point processing powerno data0.08 TFLOPS
ROPs28
TMUs416
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16MXM-II

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed450 MHz792 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s25.34 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model3.04.0
OpenGL2.13.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 March 2006 25 October 2008
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 23 Watt

FX 350M has 53.3% lower power consumption.

9600M GT Mac Edition, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 63.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 350M and GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 350M is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M
Quadro FX 350M
NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition
GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Quadro FX 350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 4 votes

Rate GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 350M or GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.