Radeon HD 7540D IGP vs Quadro FX 3500M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1224not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.11no data
Power efficiency1.25no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameG71Scrapper
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 March 2007 (19 years ago)2 October 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99.99 $67

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32192
Core clock speed575 MHz760 MHz
Boost clock speed575 MHzno data
Number of transistors278 million1,303 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate13.809.120
Floating-point processing powerno data0.2918 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs2412

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-IIIIGP
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed600 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model3.05.0
OpenGL2.14.4
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2007 2 October 2012
Chip lithography 90 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 65 Watt

FX 3500M has 44% lower power consumption.

HD 7540D IGP, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 181% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 3500M and Radeon HD 7540D IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 3500M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 7540D IGP is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 3500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 87 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7540D IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 3500M or Radeon HD 7540D IGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.