Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M vs Quadro FX 3500M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1205not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.11no data
Power efficiency1.24no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Gen. 4.5 (2008)
GPU code nameG71GL40
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date1 March 2007 (18 years ago)1 October 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3210
Core clock speed575 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed575 MHzno data
Number of transistors278 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Wattno data
Texture fill rate13.80no data
ROPs16no data
TMUs24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-IIIno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount512 MBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed600 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)10
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.1no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2007 1 October 2008
Chip lithography 90 nm 65 nm

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 3500M and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 3500M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
Quadro FX 3500M
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 3500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 182 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 3500M or Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.