Playstation 5 Pro GPU vs Quadro FX 3500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1181not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.57no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameG71Viola
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date22 May 2006 (18 years ago)7 November 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,599 $699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3840
Core clock speed450 MHz2180 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2350 MHz
Number of transistors278 million10,600 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt232 Watt
Texture fill rate9.000564.0
Floating-point processing powerno data36.1 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs20240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data
Length173 mm386 mm
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed660 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth42.24 GB/s448.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x HDMI 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)N/A
Shader Model3.0N/A
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 May 2006 7 November 2024
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 232 Watt

FX 3500 has 190% lower power consumption.

Playstation 5 Pro GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 18 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 3500 and Playstation 5 Pro GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 3500 is a workstation graphics card while Playstation 5 Pro GPU is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500
Quadro FX 3500
AMD Playstation 5 Pro GPU
Playstation 5 Pro GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 9 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 58 votes

Rate Playstation 5 Pro GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.