A100X vs Quadro FX 3500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1245not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.61no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameG71GA100
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date22 May 2006 (19 years ago)28 June 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data6912
Core clock speed450 MHz795 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1440 MHz
Number of transistors278 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate9.000622.1
Floating-point processing powerno data19.91 TFLOPS
ROPs16160
TMUs20432
Tensor Coresno data432
L1 Cacheno data20.3 MB
L2 Cacheno data80 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length173 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount256 MB80 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed660 MHz1593 MHz
Memory bandwidth42.24 GB/s2,039 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)N/A
Shader Model3.0N/A
OpenGL2.1N/A
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-8.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 May 2006 28 June 2021
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 80 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 300 Watt

FX 3500 has 275% lower power consumption.

A100X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, a 31900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 3500 and A100X. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500
Quadro FX 3500
NVIDIA A100X
A100X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 9 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate A100X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 3500 or A100X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.