Tesla K20X vs Quadro FX 350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1442not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.74no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameG72GK110
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date20 April 2006 (19 years ago)12 November 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$7,699

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2688
Core clock speed550 MHz732 MHz
Number of transistors112 million7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)21 Watt235 Watt
Texture fill rate2.200164.0
Floating-point processing powerno data3.935 TFLOPS
ROPs248
TMUs4224
L1 Cacheno data224 KB
L2 Cacheno data1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length168 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount128 MB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed405 MHz1300 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.48 GB/s249.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGANo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (11_0)
Shader Model3.05.1
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 April 2006 12 November 2012
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 21 Watt 235 Watt

FX 350 has 1019% lower power consumption.

Tesla K20X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 350 and Tesla K20X. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 350
Quadro FX 350
NVIDIA Tesla K20X
Tesla K20X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Quadro FX 350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 53 votes

Rate Tesla K20X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 350 or Tesla K20X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.