ATI Radeon Xpress X1200 vs Quadro FX 350

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1370not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.73no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)no data
GPU code nameG72RS690M
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date20 April 2006 (18 years ago)1 February 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4
Core clock speed550 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data350 MHz
Number of transistors112 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)21 Wattno data
Texture fill rate2.200no data
ROPs2no data
TMUs4no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2no data
Maximum RAM amount128 MB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed405 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth6.48 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGAno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)no data
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.1no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 April 2006 1 February 2007
Chip lithography 90 nm 80 nm

ATI Xpress X1200 has an age advantage of 9 months, and a 12.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 350 and Radeon Xpress X1200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 350 is a workstation card while Radeon Xpress X1200 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 350
Quadro FX 350
ATI Radeon Xpress X1200
Radeon Xpress X1200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Quadro FX 350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 61 vote

Rate Radeon Xpress X1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.