ATI Radeon VE AGP vs Quadro FX 350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1450not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.73no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameG72Rage 6
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date20 April 2006 (20 years ago)19 February 2001 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed550 MHz183 MHz
Number of transistors112 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)21 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate2.2000.55
ROPs21
TMUs43

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 4x
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR
Maximum RAM amount128 MB32 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed405 MHz183 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.48 GB/s2.928 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)7.0
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.11.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 April 2006 19 February 2001
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 32 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 21 Watt 23 Watt

FX 350 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 10% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 350 and Radeon VE AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 350 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon VE AGP is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Quadro FX 350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon VE AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 350 or Radeon VE AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.