Radeon HD 7470A vs Quadro FX 350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1444not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.73no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameG72Caicos
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date20 April 2006 (19 years ago)5 January 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data160
Core clock speed550 MHz625 MHz
Number of transistors112 million370 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)21 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate2.2005.000
Floating-point processing powerno data0.2 TFLOPS
ROPs24
TMUs48
L1 Cacheno data16 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount128 MB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed405 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.48 GB/s12.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGANo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model3.05.0
OpenGL2.14.4
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 April 2006 5 January 2012
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 21 Watt 25 Watt

FX 350 has 19% lower power consumption.

HD 7470A, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 125% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 350 and Radeon HD 7470A. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 350 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 7470A is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 350
Quadro FX 350
AMD Radeon HD 7470A
Radeon HD 7470A

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Quadro FX 350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 11 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7470A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 350 or Radeon HD 7470A, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.