Radeon Sky 900 vs Quadro FX 3450

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1335not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency0.32no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameNV41Tahiti
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date28 July 2005 (20 years ago)27 March 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$135.75 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3584 ×2
Core clock speed425 MHz825 MHz
Boost clock speedno data950 MHz
Number of transistors190 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)83 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate5.100106.4 ×2
Floating-point processing powerno data3.405 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs832 ×2
TMUs12112 ×2
L1 Cacheno data448 KB
L2 Cacheno data768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length226 mm305 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB6 GB ×2
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed500 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s480 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort
Dual-link DVI support-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (11_1)
Shader Model3.05.1
OpenGL2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)4.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 July 2005 27 March 2013
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 83 Watt 300 Watt

FX 3450 has 261.4% lower power consumption.

Sky 900, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 3450 and Radeon Sky 900. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450
Quadro FX 3450
AMD Radeon Sky 900
Radeon Sky 900

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 10 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon Sky 900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 3450 or Radeon Sky 900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.