ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT vs Quadro FX 3450

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 3450 with Radeon HD 2400 XT, including specs and performance data.

FX 3450
2005, $136
256 MB GDDR3, 83 Watt
0.35
+25%

FX 3450 outperforms HD 2400 XT by a significant 25% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13371395
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency0.320.86
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameNV41RV610
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date28 July 2005 (20 years ago)28 June 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$135.75 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data40
Core clock speed425 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors190 million180 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)83 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate5.1002.600
Floating-point processing powerno data0.052 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs124
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length226 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model3.04.0
OpenGL2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)3.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FX 3450 0.35
+25%
ATI HD 2400 XT 0.28

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 3450 148
+25.4%
Samples: 2
ATI HD 2400 XT 118
Samples: 228

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.35 0.28
Recency 28 July 2005 28 June 2007
Chip lithography 130 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 83 Watt 25 Watt

FX 3450 has a 25% higher aggregate performance score.

ATI HD 2400 XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 232% lower power consumption.

The Quadro FX 3450 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 2400 XT in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 3450 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 2400 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450
Quadro FX 3450
ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT
Radeon HD 2400 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 10 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 47 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2400 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 3450 or Radeon HD 2400 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.