ATI Radeon X800 PRO AGP vs Quadro FX 3400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameNV45R420
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date28 June 2004 (21 years ago)1 May 2004 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Core clock speed350 MHz475 MHz
Number of transistors222 million160 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)101 Watt48 Watt
Texture fill rate5.6005.700
ROPs1612
TMUs1612

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 8x
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed450 MHz450 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s28.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)9.0b (9_2)
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.12.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2004 1 May 2004
Power consumption (TDP) 101 Watt 48 Watt

FX 3400 has an age advantage of 1 month.

ATI X800 PRO AGP, on the other hand, has 110% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 3400 and Radeon X800 PRO AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 3400 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon X800 PRO AGP is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 7 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Radeon X800 PRO AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 3400 or Radeon X800 PRO AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.