Radeon Pro 575 vs Quadro FX 330

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameNV37Polaris 20
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date28 June 2004 (21 years ago)5 June 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2048
Core clock speed250 MHz1096 MHz
Number of transistors45 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)21 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate1.000140.3
Floating-point processing powerno data4.489 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs4128
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount64 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz1695 MHz
Memory bandwidth3.2 GB/s217.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVINo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a12 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)4.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2004 5 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 21 Watt 120 Watt

FX 330 has 471% lower power consumption.

Pro 575, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 971% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 330 and Radeon Pro 575. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 330 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Pro 575 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 99 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 575 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 330 or Radeon Pro 575, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.