Iris Xe Graphics 80EU vs Quadro FX 3000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1468not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameNV35Raptor Lake GT1
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date22 July 2003 (22 years ago)4 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$203 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data640
Core clock speed400 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1450 MHz
Number of transistors135 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology130 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate3.20058.00
Floating-point processing powerno data1.856 TFLOPS
ROPs420
TMUs840
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data12 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xRing Bus
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x Molexno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed425 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth27.2 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)4.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 July 2003 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 130 nm 10 nm

Iris Xe Graphics 80EU has an age advantage of 19 years, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 3000 and Iris Xe Graphics 80EU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 3000 is a workstation graphics card while Iris Xe Graphics 80EU is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000
Quadro FX 3000
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU
Iris Xe Graphics 80EU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 8 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 264 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics 80EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 3000 or Iris Xe Graphics 80EU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.