Radeon Pro 570X vs Quadro FX 2800M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1160not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.02no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameG92Polaris 20
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date1 December 2009 (16 years ago)18 March 2019 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores961792
Core clock speed600 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1105 MHz
Number of transistors754 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate28.80123.8
Floating-point processing power0.288 TFLOPS3.96 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs48112
L1 Cacheno data448 KB
L2 Cache64 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1700 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s217.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 December 2009 18 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 120 Watt

FX 2800M has 60% lower power consumption.

Pro 570X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 2800M and Radeon Pro 570X. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 8 votes

Rate Quadro FX 2800M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 46 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 570X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 2800M or Radeon Pro 570X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.