Radeon HD 8950M vs Quadro FX 2700M
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1125 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.02 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.01 | no data |
| Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) |
| GPU code name | G94 | Saturn |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 14 August 2008 (16 years ago) | 14 May 2013 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $99.95 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 48 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 530 MHz | 1075 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 505 million | 2,080 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 12.72 | 51.60 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.1272 TFLOPS | 1.651 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 24 | 48 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | MXM-HE | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 799 MHz | 1375 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.14 GB/s | 88 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 1.1 | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 14 August 2008 | 14 May 2013 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 2 GB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 100 Watt |
FX 2700M has 53.8% lower power consumption.
HD 8950M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 2700M and Radeon HD 8950M. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Quadro FX 2700M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon HD 8950M is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
