Quadro Plex 2200 S4 vs Quadro FX 2700M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1185not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency1.03no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameG94GT200B
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date14 August 2008 (17 years ago)25 July 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99.95 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48240 ×4
Core clock speed530 MHz648 MHz
Number of transistors505 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate12.7251.84 ×4
Floating-point processing power0.1272 TFLOPS0.6221 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs1632 ×4
TMUs2480 ×4
L2 Cache64 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-HEPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data522 mm

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB ×4
Memory bus width256 Bit512 Bit ×4
Memory clock speed799 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.14 GB/s102.4 GB/s ×4
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.11.3

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 600 Watt

FX 2700M has 823.1% lower power consumption.

Plex 2200 S4, on the other hand, has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 18.2% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 2700M and Quadro Plex 2200 S4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 2700M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Quadro Plex 2200 S4 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
Quadro FX 2700M
NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2200 S4
Quadro Plex 2200 S4

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 10 votes

Rate Quadro FX 2700M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro Plex 2200 S4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 2700M or Quadro Plex 2200 S4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.