GeForce4 MX 440-8x vs Quadro FX 2500M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1279not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.89no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameG71NV18 A2
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date29 September 2005 (20 years ago)25 September 2002 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32no data
Core clock speed500 MHz275 MHz
Boost clock speed500 MHzno data
Number of transistors278 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Wattno data
Texture fill rate12.001.100
ROPs162
TMUs244

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-IIIAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB32 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit32 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)8.0
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.11.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 September 2005 25 September 2002
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 32 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 150 nm

FX 2500M has an age advantage of 3 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 2500M and GeForce4 MX 440-8x. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 2500M is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce4 MX 440-8x is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M
Quadro FX 2500M
NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 440-8x
GeForce4 MX 440-8x

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 5 votes

Rate Quadro FX 2500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 70 votes

Rate GeForce4 MX 440-8x on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 2500M or GeForce4 MX 440-8x, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.