ATI Rage 128 Ultra vs Quadro FX 1800M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1103not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.98no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Rage 4 (1998−1999)
GPU code nameGT215Rage 4
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date15 June 2009 (16 years ago)1 August 1999 (26 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores72no data
Core clock speed561 MHz119 MHz
Number of transistors727 million8 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Wattno data
Texture fill rate13.460.24
Floating-point processing power0.162 TFLOPSno data
ROPs82
TMUs242
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5SDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB32 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed550 MHz119 MHz
Memory bandwidth35.2 GB/s952.0 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)6.0
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.31.2
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 June 2009 1 August 1999
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 250 nm

FX 1800M has an age advantage of 9 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 525% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 1800M and Rage 128 Ultra. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 1800M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Rage 128 Ultra is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
Quadro FX 1800M
ATI Rage 128 Ultra
Rage 128 Ultra

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 6 votes

Rate Quadro FX 1800M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Rage 128 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 1800M or Rage 128 Ultra, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.