Iris Xe Graphics 96EU vs Quadro FX 1800M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1099not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.02no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGT215Raptor Lake GT1
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date15 June 2009 (16 years ago)4 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores72768
Core clock speed561 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Number of transistors727 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate13.4672.00
Floating-point processing power0.162 TFLOPS2.304 TFLOPS
ROPs824
TMUs2448
L2 Cache64 KB1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)Ring Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed550 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth35.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 June 2009 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 15 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics 96EU has an age advantage of 13 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 1800M and Iris Xe Graphics 96EU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 1800M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Iris Xe Graphics 96EU is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
Quadro FX 1800M
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 6 votes

Rate Quadro FX 1800M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 274 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics 96EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 1800M or Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.