Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500 vs Quadro FX 1800M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1103not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.98no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)PowerVR SGX5 (2008−2011)
GPU code nameGT215GMA 500
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date15 June 2009 (16 years ago)1 November 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores724
Core clock speed561 MHz200 MHz
Number of transistors727 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Wattno data
Texture fill rate13.46no data
Floating-point processing power0.162 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs24no data
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed550 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth35.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)10.1
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 June 2009 1 November 2008
Chip lithography 40 nm 130 nm

FX 1800M has an age advantage of 7 months, and a 225% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 1800M and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 1800M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
Quadro FX 1800M
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 6 votes

Rate Quadro FX 1800M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 26 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 1800M or Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.