Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
FX 3700M vs FX 1800
Combined performance score
FX 3700M outperforms FX 1800 by 15% in our combined benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 1061 | 1022 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Value for money | 0.04 | 0.05 |
Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | G9x (2007−2010) |
GPU code name | G94 | NB9E-GLM3 |
Market segment | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 30 March 2009 (14 years old) | 14 August 2008 (15 years old) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $489 | $925 |
Current price | $132 (0.3x MSRP) | $163 (0.2x MSRP) |
FX 3700M has 25% better value for money than FX 1800.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 64 | 128 |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 550 MHz |
Number of transistors | 505 million | 754 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 59 Watt | 75 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 17.60 | 35.20 |
Floating-point performance | 176 gflops | 352.0 gflops |
Size and compatibility
Information on Quadro FX 1800 and Quadro FX 3700M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | no data | large |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-HE |
Length | 198 mm | no data |
Width | 1-slot | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 768 MB | 1 GB |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 38.4 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | no data | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | 1.1 | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
FX 3700M outperforms FX 1800 by 15% in our combined benchmark results.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
FX 3700M outperforms FX 1800 by 14% in Passmark.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score | 1.03 | 1.18 |
Recency | 30 March 2009 | 14 August 2008 |
Cost | $489 | $925 |
Maximum RAM amount | 768 MB | 1 GB |
Power consumption (TDP) | 59 Watt | 75 Watt |
The Quadro FX 3700M is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 1800 in performance tests.
Be aware that Quadro FX 1800 is a workstation card while Quadro FX 3700M is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.